Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vera Isler-Leiner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Vera Isler-Leiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP for 2+ years, notability unclear Black Kite (t) (c) 23:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment GBooks shows some sources in German, though I do not know what level of coverage they provide. The Books LLC hits are in English, but useless, since that company publishes copies of Wikipedia articles. Edward321 (talk) 14:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: one of her photobooks, Spitzen-Platze: Arbeitsplatze von Spitzenkraften (ISBN 3723103804), was published by Stemmle. That's not bad going. -- Hoary (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find any even barely worthwhile sources. BTW, i just prodded another article from the same article creator, Joe Brockerhoff, for the same reason.--Milowent • talkblp-r 15:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.